2000 GMC Jimmy vs. 1963 Jaguar MK II
To start off, 2000 GMC Jimmy is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 4,298 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Jimmy is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 GMC Jimmy (190 HP) has 70 more horse power than 1963 Jaguar MK II. (120 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 GMC Jimmy should accelerate faster than 1963 Jaguar MK II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Jimmy weights approximately 505 kg more than 1963 Jaguar MK II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Jimmy (340 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Jaguar MK II. (195 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Jimmy will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Jaguar MK II.
Compare all specifications:
2000 GMC Jimmy | 1963 Jaguar MK II | |
Make | GMC | Jaguar |
Model | Jimmy | MK II |
Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4298 cc | 2482 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 120 HP |
Torque | 340 Nm | 195 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2900 mm |