2000 GMC Safari vs. 1953 Maserati A6GCM
To start off, 2000 GMC Safari is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Maserati A6GCM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Maserati A6GCM would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Maserati A6GCM (194 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2000 GMC Safari. (187 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Maserati A6GCM should accelerate faster than 2000 GMC Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Safari weights approximately 1385 kg more than 1953 Maserati A6GCM.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 GMC Safari has automatic transmission and 1953 Maserati A6GCM has manual transmission. 1953 Maserati A6GCM will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 GMC Safari will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 GMC Safari | 1953 Maserati A6GCM | |
Make | GMC | Maserati |
Model | Safari | A6GCM |
Year Released | 2000 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 1959 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 194 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 8000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 570 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2290 mm |