2000 GMC Safari vs. 1997 Mazda SW-X
To start off, 2000 GMC Safari is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mazda SW-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mazda SW-X would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Safari weights approximately 850 kg more than 1997 Mazda SW-X.
Because 2000 GMC Safari is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 GMC Safari. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mazda SW-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 GMC Safari | 1997 Mazda SW-X | |
| Make | GMC | Mazda |
| Model | Safari | SW-X |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 1105 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 55 L |
