2000 GMC Safari vs. 1998 Acura TL
To start off, 2000 GMC Safari is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Acura TL would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 GMC Safari (190 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1998 Acura TL. (176 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 GMC Safari should accelerate faster than 1998 Acura TL.
Because 2000 GMC Safari is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 GMC Safari. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 GMC Safari | 1998 Acura TL | |
Make | GMC | Acura |
Model | Safari | TL |
Year Released | 2000 | 1998 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 176 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2840 mm |