2000 GMC Safari vs. 1998 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 2000 GMC Safari is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Oldsmobile SS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Oldsmobile SS would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Oldsmobile SS (202 HP) has 12 more horse power than 2000 GMC Safari. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 2000 GMC Safari.
Because 2000 GMC Safari is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 GMC Safari. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Oldsmobile SS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 319 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2000 GMC Safari | 1998 Oldsmobile SS | |
Make | GMC | Oldsmobile |
Model | Safari | SS |
Year Released | 2000 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 202 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1900 mm |