2000 GMC Safari vs. 2004 Isuzu Axiom
To start off, 2004 Isuzu Axiom is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Safari would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Isuzu Axiom (250 HP) has 60 more horse power than 2000 GMC Safari. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Axiom should accelerate faster than 2000 GMC Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Safari weights approximately 140 kg more than 2004 Isuzu Axiom.
Because 2004 Isuzu Axiom is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 GMC Safari. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Axiom will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Isuzu Axiom (335 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 GMC Safari. (319 Nm). This means 2004 Isuzu Axiom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 GMC Safari.
Compare all specifications:
2000 GMC Safari | 2004 Isuzu Axiom | |
Make | GMC | Isuzu |
Model | Safari | Axiom |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 3491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 250 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 335 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1956 kg | 1816 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2710 mm |