2000 GMC Safari vs. 2006 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2006 Honda CR-V is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Safari would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 GMC Safari (190 HP) has 33 more horse power than 2006 Honda CR-V. (157 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 GMC Safari should accelerate faster than 2006 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Honda CR-V weights approximately 34 kg more than 2000 GMC Safari.
Because 2006 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 GMC Safari. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Safari (319 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Honda CR-V. (217 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2000 GMC Safari | 2006 Honda CR-V | |
Make | GMC | Honda |
Model | Safari | CR-V |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 2360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 157 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 217 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1956 kg | 1990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2630 mm |