2000 GMC Safari vs. 2006 Nissan Navara
To start off, 2006 Nissan Navara is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Safari would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 GMC Safari (190 HP) has 18 more horse power than 2006 Nissan Navara. (172 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 GMC Safari should accelerate faster than 2006 Nissan Navara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Nissan Navara weights approximately 168 kg more than 2000 GMC Safari.
Because 2006 Nissan Navara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 GMC Safari. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Navara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan Navara (403 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 GMC Safari. (319 Nm). This means 2006 Nissan Navara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 GMC Safari.
Compare all specifications:
2000 GMC Safari | 2006 Nissan Navara | |
Make | GMC | Nissan |
Model | Safari | Navara |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Body Type | Van | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 172 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 403 Nm |
Top Speed | 165 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1956 kg | 2124 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3210 mm |