2000 GMC Safari vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Safari would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 GMC Safari (190 HP) has 37 more horse power than 2009 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 GMC Safari should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Epica.
Because 2000 GMC Safari is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 GMC Safari. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Safari (319 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 GMC Safari | 2009 Holden Epica | |
| Make | GMC | Holden |
| Model | Safari | Epica |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Van | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4294 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2700 mm |
