2000 GMC Safari vs. 2010 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac STS is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Safari would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac STS (302 HP) has 112 more horse power than 2000 GMC Safari. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 2000 GMC Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Safari weights approximately 154 kg more than 2010 Cadillac STS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac STS (368 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 GMC Safari. (319 Nm). This means 2010 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 GMC Safari.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 GMC Safari | 2010 Cadillac STS | |
| Make | GMC | Cadillac |
| Model | Safari | STS |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Van | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4294 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 302 HP |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 368 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1956 kg | 1802 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1844 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1463 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2957 mm |
