2000 GMC Safari vs. 2011 Mazda 6
To start off, 2011 Mazda 6 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Safari would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda 6 (272 HP) has 82 more horse power than 2000 GMC Safari. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2000 GMC Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Safari weights approximately 347 kg more than 2011 Mazda 6.
Because 2000 GMC Safari is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 GMC Safari. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda 6 (364 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 GMC Safari. (319 Nm). This means 2011 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 GMC Safari.
Compare all specifications:
2000 GMC Safari | 2011 Mazda 6 | |
Make | GMC | Mazda |
Model | Safari | 6 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 272 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 364 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1956 kg | 1609 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1839 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2789 mm |