2000 GMC Safari vs. 2012 Nissan NV
To start off, 2012 Nissan NV is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Safari would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan NV (261 HP) has 71 more horse power than 2000 GMC Safari. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan NV should accelerate faster than 2000 GMC Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan NV weights approximately 699 kg more than 2000 GMC Safari. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan NV (381 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 GMC Safari. (319 Nm). This means 2012 Nissan NV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 GMC Safari.
Compare all specifications:
2000 GMC Safari | 2012 Nissan NV | |
Make | GMC | Nissan |
Model | Safari | NV |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 261 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 381 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1956 kg | 2655 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 6111 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 2131 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3711 mm |