2000 GMC Safari vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Safari would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (266 HP) has 76 more horse power than 2000 GMC Safari. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2000 GMC Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Safari weights approximately 135 kg more than 2013 Cadillac CTS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Safari (319 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Cadillac CTS. (302 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
2000 GMC Safari | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | GMC | Cadillac |
Model | Safari | CTS |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | Van | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 266 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 302 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1956 kg | 1821 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4877 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2880 mm |