2000 GMC Sierra vs. 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220
To start off, 2000 GMC Sierra is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 GMC Sierra (197 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. (78 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220.
Because 2000 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Sierra (353 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. (142 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2000 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220.
Compare all specifications:
2000 GMC Sierra | 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 | |
Make | GMC | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Sierra | 220 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 2195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 78 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2850 mm |