2000 GMC Sierra vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2000 GMC Sierra is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 GMC Sierra (197 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Sierra weights approximately 605 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Sierra (353 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 GMC Sierra | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | GMC | Triumph |
| Model | Sierra | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4293 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 353 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1775 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2700 mm |
