2000 GMC Sierra vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2000 GMC Sierra is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 GMC Sierra (197 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Sierra weights approximately 1005 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Sierra (353 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2000 GMC Sierra | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | GMC | Zastava |
Model | Sierra | 102 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1775 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2160 mm |