2000 GMC Sierra vs. 1982 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2000 GMC Sierra is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Sierra weights approximately 295 kg more than 1982 Mercury Cougar.
Because 2000 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 GMC Sierra | 1982 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | GMC | Mercury |
Model | Sierra | Cougar |
Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 4942 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1775 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2650 mm |