2000 GMC Sierra vs. 1995 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2000 GMC Sierra is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Sierra weights approximately 149 kg more than 1995 Mercury Cougar.
Because 2000 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 GMC Sierra | 1995 Mercury Cougar | |
| Make | GMC | Mercury |
| Model | Sierra | Cougar |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1995 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4293 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1775 kg | 1626 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1860 mm |
