2000 GMC Sierra vs. 1998 Rover 400
To start off, 2000 GMC Sierra is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 400 would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 GMC Sierra (197 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1998 Rover 400. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 400.
Because 2000 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Rover 400. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Sierra (353 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover 400. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
2000 GMC Sierra | 1998 Rover 400 | |
Make | GMC | Rover |
Model | Sierra | 400 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2560 mm |