2000 GMC Sierra vs. 2001 BMW Z3
To start off, 2001 BMW Z3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z3 (227 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2000 GMC Sierra. (197 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 2000 GMC Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Sierra weights approximately 415 kg more than 2001 BMW Z3.
Because 2000 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 BMW Z3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Sierra (353 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Z3. (300 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Z3.
Compare all specifications:
2000 GMC Sierra | 2001 BMW Z3 | |
Make | GMC | BMW |
Model | Sierra | Z3 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2001 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 2926 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1775 kg | 1360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2450 mm |