2000 GMC Sierra vs. 2001 Lancia Nea

To start off, 2001 Lancia Nea is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 GMC Sierra (197 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Sierra weights approximately 405 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Lancia Nea. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Sierra (353 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lancia Nea. (314 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lancia Nea. 2001 Lancia Nea has automatic transmission and 2000 GMC Sierra has manual transmission. 2000 GMC Sierra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Lancia Nea will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: