2000 GMC Sierra vs. 2003 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2003 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda RX-8 (228 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2000 GMC Sierra. (197 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2000 GMC Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Sierra weights approximately 350 kg more than 2003 Mazda RX-8.
Because 2000 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Sierra (353 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda RX-8. (211 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2000 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
2000 GMC Sierra | 2003 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | GMC | Mazda |
Model | Sierra | RX-8 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 8200 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 211 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1775 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2710 mm |