2000 GMC Sierra vs. 2004 Volvo S60
To start off, 2004 Volvo S60 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo S60 (247 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2000 GMC Sierra. (197 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2000 GMC Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Sierra weights approximately 209 kg more than 2004 Volvo S60.
Because 2000 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Volvo S60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Sierra (353 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Volvo S60. (330 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Volvo S60.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 GMC Sierra | 2004 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | GMC | Volvo |
| Model | Sierra | S60 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4293 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 247 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 353 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1775 kg | 1566 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2670 mm |
