2000 GMC Sierra vs. 2004 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2004 Volvo XC90 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo XC90 (268 HP) has 71 more horse power than 2000 GMC Sierra. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2000 GMC Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 331 kg more than 2000 GMC Sierra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo XC90 (380 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 GMC Sierra. (353 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2004 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 GMC Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
2000 GMC Sierra | 2004 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | GMC | Volvo |
Model | Sierra | XC90 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 2901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 268 HP |
Torque | 353 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1775 kg | 2106 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2870 mm |