2000 GMC Sierra vs. 2010 BMW Z4
To start off, 2010 BMW Z4 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW Z4 (300 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2000 GMC Sierra. (197 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW Z4 should accelerate faster than 2000 GMC Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Sierra weights approximately 210 kg more than 2010 BMW Z4.
Because 2000 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 BMW Z4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 BMW Z4 (406 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 GMC Sierra. (353 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2010 BMW Z4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 GMC Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
2000 GMC Sierra | 2010 BMW Z4 | |
Make | GMC | BMW |
Model | Sierra | Z4 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 406 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1775 kg | 1565 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 4239 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1791 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2497 mm |