2000 GMC Sierra vs. 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML (201 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2000 GMC Sierra. (197 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 2000 GMC Sierra.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML (500 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 GMC Sierra. (353 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 GMC Sierra. 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML has automatic transmission and 2000 GMC Sierra has manual transmission. 2000 GMC Sierra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 GMC Sierra | 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
| Make | GMC | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Sierra | ML |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4293 cc | 2987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 201 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 353 Nm | 500 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 7-speed shiftable automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 4803 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1796 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2916 mm |
