2000 GMC Terradyne vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Terradyne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Terradyne would be higher. At 6,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 GMC Terradyne is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Terradyne weights approximately 187 kg more than 2013 Cadillac CTS.
Because 2000 GMC Terradyne is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 GMC Terradyne will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 GMC Terradyne | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | GMC | Cadillac |
Model | Terradyne | CTS |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6600 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 266 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 1768 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2880 mm |