2000 GMC Yukon vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 2000 GMC Yukon is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Yukon weights approximately 821 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ.
Because 2000 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Holden EJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Yukon (442 Nm) has 279 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 GMC Yukon | 1963 Holden EJ | |
| Make | GMC | Holden |
| Model | Yukon | EJ |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 5300 cc | 2262 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 64 HP |
| Torque | 442 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 1134 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2680 mm |
