2000 GMC Yukon vs. 1965 Nissan Cedric

To start off, 2000 GMC Yukon is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 4,819 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 GMC Yukon (260 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Yukon weights approximately 1280 kg more than 1965 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Nissan Cedric. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Yukon (393 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Nissan Cedric.

Compare all specifications:

2000 GMC Yukon 1965 Nissan Cedric
Make GMC Nissan
Model Yukon Cedric
Year Released 2000 1965
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4819 cc 1488 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 260 HP 60 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 393 Nm 115 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Vehicle Weight 2260 kg 980 kg
Vehicle Length 5060 mm 4420 mm
Vehicle Width 2010 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1890 mm 1530 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2540 mm