2000 GMC Yukon vs. 1966 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2000 GMC Yukon is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 4,819 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 GMC Yukon (260 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 1966 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Yukon weights approximately 970 kg more than 1966 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Yukon (393 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2000 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2000 GMC Yukon | 1966 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | GMC | Nissan |
Model | Yukon | Cedric |
Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4819 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2260 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2700 mm |