2000 GMC Yukon vs. 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 2000 GMC Yukon is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Yukon weights approximately 135 kg more than 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire.
Because 2000 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 GMC Yukon | 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
| Make | GMC | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Yukon | Starfire |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 5300 cc | 6965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 1820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 5370 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 3130 mm |
