2000 GMC Yukon vs. 1968 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2000 GMC Yukon is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,819 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 GMC Yukon (260 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Yukon weights approximately 1090 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Yukon (393 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2000 GMC Yukon | 1968 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | GMC | Triumph |
Model | Yukon | 2000 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4819 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2260 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2700 mm |