2000 GMC Yukon vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2000 GMC Yukon is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Yukon weights approximately 1090 kg more than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 2000 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Yukon (442 Nm) has 327 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (115 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. 2000 GMC Yukon has automatic transmission and 1982 Nissan Pulsar has manual transmission. 1982 Nissan Pulsar will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 GMC Yukon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 GMC Yukon | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | GMC | Nissan |
| Model | Yukon | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 5300 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 442 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2420 mm |
