2000 GMC Yukon vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2000 GMC Yukon is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 5,964 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 GMC Yukon (283 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 234 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Yukon weights approximately 1520 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Yukon (481 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 386 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 GMC Yukon | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | GMC | Zastava |
| Model | Yukon | 102 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 5964 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 283 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 481 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2290 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2160 mm |
