2000 GMC Yukon vs. 1989 Matra-Simca M25
To start off, 2000 GMC Yukon is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Matra-Simca M25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Matra-Simca M25 would be higher. At 5,326 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Matra-Simca M25. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Yukon (451 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Matra-Simca M25. (363 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Matra-Simca M25. 2000 GMC Yukon has automatic transmission and 1989 Matra-Simca M25 has manual transmission. 1989 Matra-Simca M25 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 GMC Yukon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 GMC Yukon | 1989 Matra-Simca M25 | |
| Make | GMC | Matra-Simca |
| Model | Yukon | M25 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5326 cc | 1764 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 269 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 451 Nm | 363 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 2 seats |
