2000 GMC Yukon vs. 2001 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Yukon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Yukon would be higher. At 5,964 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 GMC Yukon (283 HP) has 61 more horse power than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover. (222 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Yukon (481 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover. (407 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
2000 GMC Yukon | 2001 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | GMC | Land Rover |
Model | Yukon | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2000 | 2001 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5964 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 283 HP | 222 HP |
Torque | 481 Nm | 407 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 9 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2550 mm |