2000 GMC Yukon vs. 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR
To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Yukon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Yukon would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Yukon weights approximately 955 kg more than 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
Because 2000 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 GMC Yukon has automatic transmission and 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR has manual transmission. 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 GMC Yukon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 GMC Yukon | 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | |
Make | GMC | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Yukon | CLK GTR |
Year Released | 2000 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
Engine Size | 5300 cc | 4998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2680 mm |