2000 GMC Yukon vs. 2004 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Yukon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Yukon would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Yukon weights approximately 4 kg more than 2004 Jeep Cherokee.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Yukon (442 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Jeep Cherokee. (312 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Jeep Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2000 GMC Yukon | 2004 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | GMC | Jeep |
Model | Yukon | Cherokee |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 5300 cc | 3698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 207 HP |
Torque | 442 Nm | 312 Nm |
Top Speed | 177 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 1951 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2660 mm |