2000 GMC Yukon vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK

To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Yukon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Yukon would be higher. At 5,437 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK (574 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 314 more horse power than 2000 GMC Yukon. (260 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 2000 GMC Yukon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Yukon weights approximately 512 kg more than 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK.

Because 2000 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK (800 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 407 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 GMC Yukon. (393 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 GMC Yukon.

Compare all specifications:

2000 GMC Yukon 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK
Make GMC Mercedes-Benz
Model Yukon CLK
Year Released 2000 2004
Body Type SUV Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4819 cc 5437 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 260 HP 574 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6100 RPM
Torque 393 Nm 800 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3500 RPM
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 6 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 2260 kg 1748 kg
Vehicle Length 5060 mm 4660 mm
Vehicle Width 2010 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1890 mm 1370 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2970 mm