2000 GMC Yukon vs. 2006 GMC Canyon
To start off, 2006 GMC Canyon is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Yukon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Yukon would be higher. At 5,326 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 GMC Yukon (269 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 2006 GMC Canyon. (175 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 2006 GMC Canyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 GMC Canyon weights approximately 287 kg more than 2000 GMC Yukon.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Yukon (451 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 GMC Canyon. (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2000 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
2000 GMC Yukon | 2006 GMC Canyon | |
Make | GMC | GMC |
Model | Yukon | Canyon |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5326 cc | 2770 cc |
Horse Power | 269 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 451 Nm | 251 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2290 kg | 2577 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 140 L | 72 L |