2000 GMC Yukon vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Yukon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Yukon would be higher. At 6,208 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Yukon weights approximately 200 kg more than 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Because 2000 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK (631 Nm) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 GMC Yukon. (442 Nm). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 GMC Yukon.
Compare all specifications:
2000 GMC Yukon | 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
Make | GMC | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Yukon | CLK |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 5300 cc | 6208 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 474 HP |
Torque | 442 Nm | 631 Nm |
Top Speed | 177 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 1755 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2720 mm |