2000 Holden Astra vs. 1956 Simca Aronde
To start off, 2000 Holden Astra is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Simca Aronde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Simca Aronde would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Holden Astra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Holden Astra (120 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1956 Simca Aronde. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Holden Astra should accelerate faster than 1956 Simca Aronde.
Because 1956 Simca Aronde is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Simca Aronde. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden Astra (165 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Simca Aronde. (90 Nm). This means 2000 Holden Astra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Simca Aronde.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden Astra | 1956 Simca Aronde | |
Make | Holden | Simca |
Model | Astra | Aronde |
Year Released | 2000 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1290 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 90 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2450 mm |