2000 Holden Astra vs. 2001 Pontiac Montana

To start off, 2001 Pontiac Montana is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden Astra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden Astra would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Pontiac Montana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Pontiac Montana (148 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2000 Holden Astra. (120 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Pontiac Montana should accelerate faster than 2000 Holden Astra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Pontiac Montana weights approximately 195 kg more than 2000 Holden Astra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Pontiac Montana (210 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Holden Astra. (165 Nm). This means 2001 Pontiac Montana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Holden Astra. 2001 Pontiac Montana has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden Astra has manual transmission. 2000 Holden Astra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Pontiac Montana will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: