2000 Holden Astra vs. 2005 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2005 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden Astra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden Astra would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2000 Holden Astra. (120 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 2000 Holden Astra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 133 kg more than 2000 Holden Astra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan X-Trail (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Holden Astra. (165 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Holden Astra.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden Astra | 2005 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | Astra | X-Trail |
Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1152 kg | 1285 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2540 mm |