2000 Holden Astra vs. 2009 Mazda 3

To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden Astra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden Astra would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Holden Astra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Holden Astra (120 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (83 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Holden Astra should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 3 kg more than 2000 Holden Astra.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden Astra (165 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 Holden Astra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Holden Astra 2009 Mazda 3
Make Holden Mazda
Model Astra 3
Year Released 2000 2009
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1796 cc 1347 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 120 HP 83 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5700 RPM
Torque 165 Nm 124 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1152 kg 1155 kg
Vehicle Length 4260 mm 4430 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 2650 mm