2000 Holden Astra vs. 2009 Mazda 3

To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden Astra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden Astra would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (141 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2000 Holden Astra. (120 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Holden Astra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 333 kg more than 2000 Holden Astra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (360 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Holden Astra. (165 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Holden Astra.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Holden Astra 2009 Mazda 3
Make Holden Mazda
Model Astra 3
Year Released 2000 2009
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1796 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 120 HP 141 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 3500 RPM
Torque 165 Nm 360 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 2000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1152 kg 1485 kg
Vehicle Length 4260 mm 4420 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 2650 mm