2000 Holden Commodore vs. 1980 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2000 Holden Commodore is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Holden Commodore (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Holden Commodore weights approximately 755 kg more than 1980 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden Commodore | 1980 Zastava 850 K | |
Make | Holden | Zastava |
Model | Commodore | 850 K |
Year Released | 2000 | 1980 |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 848 cc |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2010 mm |