2000 Holden Commodore vs. 1982 Talbot Samba
To start off, 2000 Holden Commodore is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Talbot Samba. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Talbot Samba would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Holden Commodore (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1982 Talbot Samba. (44 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1982 Talbot Samba. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Holden Commodore weights approximately 870 kg more than 1982 Talbot Samba. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden Commodore (304 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Talbot Samba. (64 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Talbot Samba.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden Commodore | 1982 Talbot Samba | |
Make | Holden | Talbot |
Model | Commodore | Samba |
Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 304 Nm | 64 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2350 mm |