2000 Holden Commodore vs. 1992 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 2000 Holden Commodore is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mahindra Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mahindra Armada would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Holden Commodore (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1992 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1992 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 390 kg more than 2000 Holden Commodore.
Because 1992 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden Commodore | 1992 Mahindra Armada | |
| Make | Holden | Mahindra |
| Model | Commodore | Armada |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1992 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 2000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 4310 mm |
