2000 Holden Commodore vs. 1997 Jeep Dakar
To start off, 2000 Holden Commodore is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Jeep Dakar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Jeep Dakar would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Jeep Dakar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Holden Commodore (197 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1997 Jeep Dakar. (190 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1997 Jeep Dakar.
Because 2000 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Jeep Dakar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Jeep Dakar has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2000 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Jeep Dakar will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden Commodore | 1997 Jeep Dakar | |
Make | Holden | Jeep |
Model | Commodore | Dakar |
Year Released | 2000 | 1997 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 190 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2760 mm |